speakers notes home

General Forum: Monday 2nd October

15.15 - 16.00 Scott Singer - Sinclair Roche & Temperley


Legal Issues for dot.com companies

 

Scott Singer, Head of IT Law, Sinclair Roche & Temperley

www.srtlaw.com

Royex House, Aldermanbury Square, London EC2V 7LE

(t) +44 (0)20 7452 4000

(f) +44 (0)20 7452 4001

Marcus Iles, e-commerce project team, ITIC

www.itic-insure.com

International House, Creechurch Lane, London EC3A 5BA

(t) +44 (0)20 7204 2347

(f) +44 (0)20 7338 0151

  • Introduction
  • liability for emails
  • liability for statements/content in cyberspace
  • e-ideas and intellectual property rights
  • agreements in cyberspace
  • ramifications of the global nature of the internet
  • data protection
  • conclusion

Legal disclaimer notice

This paper, as delivered during the presentation and as set out in this outline, is intended as a general introduction to the issues covered only and should NOT be relied upon without FIRST seeking specific specialist advice for the situation in question. SRT IT Law Unit may be contacted on +44 (0)20 7452 4000 (tel) and +44 (0)20 7452 4001 (fax).

ALWAYS seek specific advice.

Introduction

  • The dotcom age - the provision of information, electronically.

Liability for emails

  • Use common sense
  • Take care when using mailing lists
  • Do not make, or pass on offensive or slanderous remarks
  • If necessary, check your systems are compatible with those of your customers and service providers

E-commerce and information

  • Information is central to e-commerce
  • e-commerce centres around the use of information technology to send, receive and process information - to make money
  • Legal ramifications:
  • a dot.com’s information (eg content; know-how) is one of its most valuable assets
  • Information as property is a very difficult area in law
  • not all information can be easily protected:
  • ideas which are not original
  • information which is already in the public domain
  • The protection of information is of critical importance for dot.com companies

E-commerce and ideas

  • Far more scope on the electronic frontier for a new idea than in the terrestrial world
  • 1991: NSF relaxes ban on commercial applications
  • 10 years of history vs 10,000
  • The money in e-commerce at present is in putting new ideas into effect rather than using them to make money per se
  • Protection of ideas is critical

Protecting information and ideas

  • Registrations to protect brands
  • in all relevant jurisdictions
  • trademarks: eg egg; smile
  • domain names: protective registrations to prevent cybersquatters
  • company names
  • Patents: software; methods of doing business
  • Confidentiality: for know-how and commercial information
  • Use NDAs
  • Relevant provision in contracts with 3rd parties and employees
  • Copyright: original ideas expressed in permanent form
  • Develop goodwill
  • Advertising: often conventional first, then electronic
  • IPRs are strengthened through use and active protection

Electronic contracts

  • Generally, for a contract to be legally binding under English law there must be:
  • observance of any requisite formalities
  • agreement as to the terms of the contract
  • consideration
  • intention to enter into a legally binding contract
  • In cyberspace there can be particular problems with all of these - perhaps with the exception of "consideration"
  • dot.com ventures which do not pay specific attention to these issues may run into problems with the enforceability or questions over the true terms of their contracts

E-contracts: formalities

  • General rule under English law
  • no specific form is required in simple contract
  • contracts can be oral, in writing or inferred by conduct and do not require signature
  • However specific formalities are required for some contracts
  • Guarantees: s.4 Statute of Frauds
  • Bills of lading
  • Contracts for the sale of land
  • Speciality contracts - contracts by deed
  • These must be "in writing" and "signed"
  • Are electronic documents "In writing"?
  • no law on point, however many believe "yes"
  • Is an electronic signature valid
  • no law on point, however many believe "no"

E-contracts: formalities

  • Formalities: solution
  • provide for these formalities by prior agreement
  • all electronic communications and signatures to be deemed valid and binding
  • Bolero: rule book
  • UK Electronic Communications Act 2000
  • deals with these issues
  • electronic signatures
  • authentication services

E-contracts: Agreement and Incorporation

  • The essence of contract from a legal perspective is agreement
  • Certainty of what has been agreed is essential
  • suppliers of e-services will wish to ensure that they are provided on their standard terms and conditions
  • Problems can arise when agreeing electronically if care is not taken:
  • web pages are invitations to treat
  • a page which appears to be an offer to sell may me a mere supply of information
  • all the subsequent exchanges will be out by one step
  • terms may be deemed not incorporated if insufficient notice is drawn to them
  • click-wrap licences may be ineffective
  • shrink-wrap licences for packaged software may be ineffective

E-contracts: Agreement and Incorporation

  • Solution
  • structure your agreements to take account of the displaced step
  • include express terms in your terms and conditions
  • "By clicking on the Proceed Button you will be deemed to be offering to enter into an agreement with us on the terms and conditions set out below"
  • ensure that click wrap licences are incorporated into websites properly
  • buttons to be greyed out until a text window has been scrolled through to the end
  • do not use a text window - put buttons at the end of the text of the agreement
  • use notices of terms and conditions through out the site
  • hyperlinks to terms and conditions

Ramifications of the global nature of the Internet

  • A web page:
  • can, in principle, be viewed by anyone, anywhere in the world
  • can be viewed by many people at once
  • What are the ramifications of this?
  • e-commerce sites can do business with users in every jurisdiction in the world
  • What is the proper law and jurisdiction of the contract?
  • A problem of the conflict of laws
  • Contracts with consumers
  • EU distance selling directive
  • Draft amendments to the Brussels convention
  • content can theoretically fall foul of the law in every jurisdiction in the world
  • infringement of IPRs: patents, trademarks and copyright
  • other laws: obscenity; freedom of expression

Personal information - data protection

  • Trans-border data flows are prohibited outside the EU unless the recipient country respects data protection principles
  • The EU Data Protection Directive (94/46/EC):
  • "Personal data shall not be transferred to a country or territory outside the European Economic Area unless that country or territory ensures an adequate level of protection for the rights and freedoms of data subjects in relation to the processing of personal data" (The Eight Principle)
  • Therefore countries outside the EEA must have data protection laws at least as good as those within the EEA
  • Nearly all dot.com companies in the maritime and transport sector will be involved in trans-border data flows
  • In practice the processing of personal data is subject to legal control
  • "data which relate to a living individual who can be identified
  • from those data; or
  • from those data and other information which is in the possession of, or is likely to come into the possession of, the data controller" s 1(1) Data Protection Act 1998 / EU Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC)
  • What constitutes personal data?
  • Likely to be data concerning individual consumers
  • could be information concerning contacts in companies if there is sufficient detail in the data to make it more than just a bare list of commercial contacts
  • What are the controls?
  • Data must be processed in accordance with the data protection principles
  • Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data

Conclusion

  • Use common sense; take care to confirm you have used the correct content and recipient; do not pass on slanderous remarks, even if they are funny; regularly check your systems for compatibility.
  • The concept of information as property is central to E-commerce; intellectual property rights are therefore critical
  • Various legal issues must be addressed at an early stage in the project to avoid unnecessary and possibly fatal consequences once trading has begun